Witness showcase suffers slow start but ends strong
Issue date: 10/9/08
|
In a World of Sexual Insecurity was written and directed by Oleg Shik and starred Kevin (senior Bill Fuller), Haley (junior Claire Kenney) and Cleveland (senior Rajiv Mallipudi). The first few minutes of the play seemed promising; There was clever use of lighting to conceal Kevin's penis as he tried to maintain an erection for new girlfriend Haley.
Unfortunately, the whole play was about Kevin's problem getting it up and failing to be intimate with Haley. The play tried too hard to be something all modern couples can relate to with a supposed everyman-like Kevin and references to Viagra, but it soon became lost in pseudo-artistic obscurity. It was almost as if the play itself suffered from erectile dysfunction.
While the story seemed like a good idea on the surface, it tended to use sex for shock value - the explicit terminology and kinky costumes seemed to add nothing significant to the performance. It slugged along pointlessly and was not helped by Fuller's poor acting. He staggered his lines and expressions and forced the whimpers of a man who could not get it up. Kenney's performance as Haley-the-dominatrix seemed as adequate as her black leather costume, but it became just as lost as the play itself as her character became less relevant.
The only saving force was Mallipudi's excellent performance as Cleveland, the male stripper hired by Haley to have sex with her. His impassioned dance and convincing cries were the only relief from the blatant monotony of the show. It was not, however, a high enough dosage to get the play up.
The second play was Past Lives, written by junior Eric Levitz, directed by sophomore Jeremy Bremer and starring Denton (Levitz) and Jen (sophomore Yagmur Müftüoglu). While the previous play actually made some initial effort at arousal and having a coherent message, Lives simply severed its member with a knife and made no attempt whatsoever.
2008 Woodie Awards

Viewing Comments 1 - 8 of 10
Django
posted 10/10/08 @ 12:27 AM EST
Man, the critics get tougher each year. The review, while harsh, was written with adequate skill at sentence construction. However, it was also littered with nonsensical (though grammatically, pretty well constructed) sentences and on at least one occasion, the author grievously misused a word in ignorance of its definition. (Continued…)
ejango
posted 10/10/08 @ 3:08 PM EST
Haha, apparently you were involved with the play? Don't worry, not all plays can be good. Don't take it out on the review. Maybe your next showcase will be better. (Continued…)
ejango
posted 10/10/08 @ 3:47 PM EST
And Django, you should spend less time reviewing reviews and more time writing scripts that actually make sense.
Fjango
posted 10/10/08 @ 4:16 PM EST
And so ejango retaliates with a classic use of argumentum ad hominem, attacking the man speaking rather than his words. Perhaps he does so in the hopes that the failure of such counterarguments to be in any way valid over the last two thousand years will be miraculously remedied in time for his comment to come across as sardonically witty, yet aptly derisive of Django's efforts. (Continued…)
Gjango
posted 10/10/08 @ 4:28 PM EST
Even I feel some of that "aftertaste" of disappointment, and I don't really want to go to a Witness show ever again. The author made his point clear in the sand. (Continued…)
Hjango Y HALO THAR
posted 10/10/08 @ 5:03 PM EST
Y HALO THAR. I AGREE, THE SHOW WAS NOT GOOD AND SCRIPT WRITING NEED TO IMPROVE...
Django
Django
posted 10/11/08 @ 10:54 AM EST
Gjango and Manimala, I hope I did not offend you too much. It was not my intent. I criticized the review because it was not well written and because I do not like it when I see a poorly written article in the JHU Newsletter. (Continued…)
Neil
posted 10/14/08 @ 11:54 AM EST
You should all calm down with your posts. I admit that my review had some minor problems; it was my first review. However, I stand by all my points, and I wish Witness Theater better luck next time. (Continued…)
Post a Comment